Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Social Science History 2005 29(2):269-297; DOI:10.1215/01455532-29-2-269
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinicke, C.
Right arrow Articles by Grove, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

Special Section: Race, Labor Markets, and Social Disorder in Twentieth-Century America

Labor Markets, Regional Diversity, and Cotton Harvest Mechanization in the Post-World War II United States

Craig Heinicke and Wayne A. Grove

Abstract

As hand-harvest labor disappeared from the American cotton fields after World War II, labor market dynamics differed between two key production regions, the South and the West. In the South, predominantly resident African Americans and whites harvested cotton, whereas in the West the labor market was composed of white residents, domestic Latino migrant workers, and Mexican nationals temporarily immigrating under the sponsorship of the U.S. government (braceros). We use newly reconstructed data for the two regions and estimate for the first time the regional causes of the demise of the hand-harvest labor force from 1949 to 1964. Whereas cheaper harvest mechanization substantially affected both regions, the downward trend in cotton prices and government programs to control cotton acreage played important roles in the disappearance of hand-harvested cotton in the South, but not in the West.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2005 by Social Science History Association